Even if you’re not a football fan you’ve probably heard about Jon Gruden’s recent resignation as head coach of the Las Vegas Raiders.
On Monday The New York Times released vulgar emails from a decade ago by Gruden that contained language described by the media as “homophobic, “misogynistic” and “racist.”
The NFL quickly released a statement denouncing Gruden’s emails as “appalling,” “denigrating,” “abhorrent,” and “wholly contrary to the NFL’s values.”
First of all, anyone who’s been a fan of the Tampa Bay Bucs or the Raiders knows Jon Gruden has a “potty mouth.” That shouldn’t have been too shocking to the NFL.
However, a larger question is “What are the NFL’s values?”
Conservative sports journalist, Jason Whitlock, who’s also a culture critic, tweeted: “Wonder if anyone at the NFL offices has ever listened to a Dre, Snoop or Eminem album and compared them to Gruden’s emails?”
Political commentator and sports journalist, Clay Travis also tweeted, “Every rapper the NFL has performing at the Super Bowl has more offensive lyrics than Jon Gruden had in his emails.”
Amber Athey, a former White House correspondent for the Daily Caller, and the Washington editor for The Spectator, called the NFL’s response hypocritical, “a blatant double-standard, and caving in to the wokeness of our culture.
In the article, Jon Gruden exposes the NFL’s woke hypocrisy, Athey detailed numerous instances of NFL players guilty of assault, domestic abuse, battery, burglary, driving under the influence of alcohol resulting in the death of a pedestrian, and serving prison time for involvement in running a dog fighting ring. Think Michael Vick. Antonio Brown. Tyreek Hill. Ben Roethlisberger. Ray Rice.
Yet, everyone of these were allowed to continue playing in the NFL. So, what are their values?
It seems that values are only mentioned in either in sports, politics, or business when the wrong person has been criticized and offended Or the culprit has violated the woke standard everyone is supposed to be bowing down to. Then someone in leadership says, “That’s not who we are.” And adds, “That doesn’t reflect our values.”
The NFL along with most of the institutions of our society really don’t know what their values are because they’re constantly changing. Morals are situational. Ethics are personal. The standard is self. And “truth” is whatever we decide it is for ourselves, or the current culture.
However, before we go too far in cursing the darkness, isn’t it fair to ask, “Are we lighting candles?”
Are we, as Christians, “the light of world?” (Matt. 5:14-16).
Are we “shining as lights in the world, holding forth the Word of Life” (Phil. 2:15-16)
Are we reflecting the light of Christ and His gospel in our daily walk? (Eph. 5:8).
What are my values? And whose values are they?
Are my values based on and in the Word of God? Are they the unchanging verities revealed by the Holy Spirit? Penned by the apostles? And recorded in the Bible?
Do my values….
…Glorify God?
…Bless the lives of other people?
…Deal honestly with moral and ethical choices?
…Treasure the spiritual over the material?
…Provide purpose to life?
…Transcend this life?
Discerning Christians know the right answer to these questions. But more importantly, we need to examine ourselves, to see if we are value-driven. Are we practicing what we profess?
As one writer observed, “It is unlikely you will become the person you want to be, if the decisions you make conflict with your values.”
–Ken Weliever, The Preacherman
Excellent thoughts, Brother Ken! Reminds me of the old saying, “Do as I say, not as I do”.
LikeLike
He’s a traditional, hard working, light skinned man, if we’re reading this right, and he’s not apologetic for his freedom of speech. Here’s more: If you happen by a truck stop, say to get a morning meal on your way to wherever. If you happen in most locker rooms when the cameras aren’t there. If you happen to hang out with co-workers after hours. If you hang out with your friends when they really have something to say. If you remember all the thoughts you’ve ever had. You will hear and remember far, far worse. In fact, I guarantee at least 90%, if not far more, of those who target Gruden would never admit to what they’ve thought and done with a picture of themselves. If this is the worst of Gruden, he’s a saint compared. **This is what this is all about (I’m 90% sure at this point.): It’s about getting him, for political reasons. “They” target someone from time to time, and this time, it’s Gruden. They will target someone else, down the road, but they’ll work this for all it’s worth. If we don’t respond, which we will, and if people don’t care, “they” will lose interest, Gruden will be fine, and they’ll look for another scapegoat for their wrongs. It’s not about Gruden. It’s about controlling you and me while distracting us from the real problems.
LikeLike
Pingback: Weekly Recap: October 10-15 | ThePreachersWord
Ken, fantastic, and one of your very bests
You should have more repair problems, this has been a great work of writing for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
Thanks ranger. I appreciate your kind words
LikeLike